Numerical Methods


Not all CFD methods are created equal ...

 

Discrete Calculus Approach

  • Those who refuse to read the papers won't believe it - but this is an approach to discretizes PDEs exactly.  The equations are exact - but not closed (or solvable).

  • Closure occurs in the constitutive equations (where the physics is also approximated) so all the calculus operators and the physics remains exact.

  • We have explored how to construct higher-order versions of these methods.
     

Moving Mesh Adaptation

  • Mesh smoothing and mesh flipping.  This keeps positions and connectivity optimal.  These algorithms are nontrivial in 3D.  

  • Mesh motion for adaptation is fully parallel.  It is very fast (< 2% of the solution time) , and it does not alter the CPU load balance.

Unstructured Staggered Mesh Methods

  • These are a subclass of the methods described above that are well suited for the Navier-Stokes equations.

  • We have demonstrated: their conservation properties, how to use median rather than dual meshes, and how to use moving meshes (using Reynolds Transport Theorem - NOT ALE methods). 
     

Fractional Step Methods

  • Matrix analysis of these methods makes them easier to understand. In particular -  there are no boundary condition issues.

  • Exact Fractional Step Methods.  Splitting errors can become large when the implicit terms are large (implicit convection, low Re, etc).  This is a pressure removal method with no errors for incompressible flows. 

  • When iterative solution methods are used, exact fractional step requires far fewer iterations and is therefore also faster even for regular applications.


Back to top