Both Non-DVS Rate Monotonic and Non-DVS Earliest Deadline First Algorithms have Energy Consumed as 1. This is because the task sets run at the maximum allowable voltage and thus, the energy consumed.

Period WCET Actual ET

(Both RM and EDF Schedulable)
9 0.2 0.2
6 0.4 0.23
4 0.2 0.175
5 0.25 0.15
2 0.1 0.055
3 0.15 0.125

Static RM: Energy Consumed - 0.2
Static EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.2
CC EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.2
All DVS algorithms fare similarly for this task set.

(Both RM and EDF Schedulable)
2 0.1 0.075
3 0.15 0.125
4 0.2 0.175
5 0.25 0.225
10 1.4 1.375
9 0.45 0.425

Static RM: Energy Consumed - 0.2
Static EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.4
CC EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.4
Static RM algorithm fares better when compared to the Static EDF and CC EDF algorithms with energy consumed equalling 0.2

(Both RM and EDF Schedulable)
4 0.2 0.175
3 0.15 0.125
5 0.25 0.225
2 0.1 0.075
1.75 0.3 0.2
6 0.45 0.435

Static RM: Energy Consumed - 0.2
Static EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.4
CC EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.4
Static RM algorithm fares better when compared to the Static EDF and CC EDF algorithms with energy consumed equalling 0.2

(Only EDF Schedulable)
1 0.2 0.2
1 0.4 0.23
2 0.2 0.175
3 0.25 0.15
3.5 0.2 0.18
4 0.15 0.125

Static EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.8
CC EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.8
Both Static EDF and CC EDF algorithms fare similarly with energy consumed equalling 0.8

(Not Schedulable)
20 4.0 2.35
6.43 2.3 1.76
4.0 0.34 0.22
5.12 0.55 0.54
0.23 0.24 0.24
1 0.45 0.25

(Both RM and EDF Schedulable)
9 1.2 0.2
6 0.74 0.4
4 0.66 0.2
5 0.286 0.25
2 0.1 0.1
3 0.23 0.20

Static RM: Energy Consumed - 0.2
Static EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.6
CC EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.6
Static RM algorithm has greater energy savings than both Static EDF and CC EDF for this particular task set
(Both RM and EDF Schedulable)
5 0.286 0.25
2 0.1 0.1
3 0.23 0.20
3 0.25 0.15
3.5 0.2 0.18
4 0.15 0.125

Static RM: Energy Consumed - 0.2
Static EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.2
CC EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.367
Static RM and Static EDF have similar energy savings but greater than CC EDF algorithm
(Only EDF schedulable)
9 0.2 0.2
0.6 0.4 0.23
4 0.2 0.175
5 0.25 0.15
2 0.1 0.055
3 0.15 0.125

Static EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.8
CC EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.6
CC EDF has greater energy savings than Static EDF
(Both RM and EDF Schedulable)
3.0 0.23 0.20
3.1 0.15 0.125
3.2 0.23 0.20
3.3 0.25 0.15
3.4 0.15 0.125
3.5 0.2 0.18

Static RM: Energy Consumed - 0.2
Static EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.4
CC EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.2
Static RM and CC EDF algorithms have similar energy savings but greater than CC EDF
(Only EDF Schedulable)
2.5 0.543 0.2
3.6 0.35 0.23
2 0.28 0.18
1.75 0.259 0.2
3.5 0.4 0.19
4.25 0.5 0.10

Static EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.8
CC EDF: Energy Consumed - 0.8
Both Static EDF and CC EDF algorithms fare similarly with energy consumed equalling 0.8