Practical Issues for Classical IP over ATM Implementation

Bill Willcox
Nexion, Inc.

Abstract

This paper discusses a number of practical issues regarding the implementation of Classical IP over ATM, with particular regard to required standards, data structures, network management, and test environments.

Summary

Classical IP over ATM, specified in IETF RFC 1577, integrates IP and ATM technologies and minimizes the changes required to accomodate the technology in existing routers, switches, and hosts. The end to end IP routing architecture is the same as with legagy LAN technologies such as Ethernet. Because ATM is a connection oriented technology, the traditional Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) used on broadcast networks is no longer sufficient. CLIP solves this problem by specifying an ATMARP server which performs address resolution for network endpoints. IP hosts establish Switched Virtual Circuits to other IP hosts, and IP frames are delivered between hosts on these SVC's. This paper addresses a number of issues that we encountered while implementing CLIP. The following is a set of acronyms used in the paper.

	ARP - Address Resolution Protocol
	ATM - Asynchronous Transfer Mode
	CLIP - Classical IP over ATM
	IETF - Internet Engineering Task Force
	IP - Internet Protocol
	LIS - Logical IP Subnet
	MARS - Multicast Address Resolution Server
	MIB - Management Information Base
	RFC - Request for Comments
	SVC - Switched Virtual Circuit
	UNI - User Network Interface

Bill Willcox
Nexion, Inc.
289 Great Rd.
Acton, MA 01720
Tel: (508) 266-4506
Fax: (508) 266-2300
willcox@acm.org