CEE 680

Fall 2011

Homework Set #1

6 points total

1. Measures of Concentration & Charge Balance

 

                Northampton MA is currently constructing a filtration plant to treat their surface water supplies.  This is located near one of Northampton’s two major surface water sources, the Mountain Street Reservoir in Williamsburg.  This source is characterized as low-alkalinity and low-hardness, quite typical of most surface waters in New England.  On March 19, 1997, a sample of the Mountain Street Reservoir water was collected and submitted for chemical analysis.  The results are shown below.

 

Constituent

Concentration

Units

Turbidity

0.59

NTU

TDS

29

mg/L

Color

10

Color units

Odor

1

TON

pH

6.75

Log units

Total Alkalinity

13

mg-CaCO3/L

Total Hardness

20

mg-CaCO3/L

Calcium

6.7

mg/L

Magnesium

0.89

mg/L

Aluminum

<0.05

mg/L

Potassium

<1

mg/L

Sodium

5.0

mg/L

Iron

<0.05

mg/L

Manganese

0.016

mg/L

Sulfate

5.9

mg/L

Chloride

3.0

mg/L

Silver

<0.005

mg/L

Copper

<0.01

mg/L

Zinc

<0.05

mg/L

TOC[1]

3

mg/L

 

a. Estimate the bicarbonate concentration assuming that all of the measured alkalinity is bicarbonate.

0.5 points

 

b. Calculate the ionic strength

1.0 points

 

Now its important to recognize that several of the constitutents in the table above are presented as being below a certain value (probably the lab’s method detection limit).  It may be safest to assume a value of zero for all of these.  This would give a lower bound to the estimates of ionic strength and ion charge.  When calculating this, be careful to include the bicarbonate.

 

 

 

Therefore, in the traditional equivalent-based units:

I = 8.12 x 10-4 (molar units)

 

c. Determine the “analytical” concentration of [H+] using the Debye-Huckel equation.

0.5 points

 

 

d. Perform a charge balance on this water based on the measured concentrations.  Is there apparent excess charge, and if so, why?

1.0 points

 

 

Total Cations = 0.626 meq/L

Total Anions = 0.467 meq/L

 

Note that the anions and cations are added together separately.  This allows one to assess the relative degree of imbalance.  In this case, there’s a substantial imbalance; about 25% of the total charge appears to be missing (negative charges).  Why so large?  Analytical error?  A major constituent overlooked? 

 

I would say that the natural organic matter (NOM), as represented by the TOC of 3 mg/L is a likely candidate.  This material (NOM) is always negively charged, and a typical “charge density” is 20 meq/g-C.  If we use this along with the TOC, we get an additional 0.06 meq/L negative charge from the NOM.  This would bring the negative charges up to about 0.53 meq/L.  Much better, but this still suggests we may be missing something.  Some of this could come from nitrate which wasn’t measured.  One can’t ignore the possibility of analytical error as well.

 

 

e. Calculate the “theoretical” TDS based on the chemical analysis above and compare with the actual measured TDS.  Are they different, and if so why do you think this is the case?

1.0 points

Calculation of TDS is normally a simple matter of adding the concentrations of known constituents (ignoring any water).  Bicarbonate may be partly lost depending on the cations present and the temperature used in the TDS determination.  The organic matter (NOM) may also be partly lost when using higher temperatures.  The total mass of NOM can be estimated by assuming that it us usually 50% carbon by weight.  This gives 4 possible answers ranging from 21.5 to 43.4 mg/L.  If we assume that half of the bicarbonate and TOC are lost, this would give us a TDS of about 31 mg/L, a number that is not too far from the analytical determination (29 mg/L).

 


 

 

#

TDS (mg/L)

Calculation

Explanation

1

21.5

Sum of all ions above except bicarbonate

Low bound; ignoring all Carbon compounds; assuming they volaltilize t

2

27.5

Same as #1, but with 2*TOC

Assumes that bicarbonate volatilizes but NOM remains

3

37.4

Same as #1, but with bicarbonate

Assuming bicarbonate remains, but NOM is volatilized

4

43.4

Same as #3, but with 2*TOC

Assumes all C-compounds remain

 

 

 

 

2.  Activity

A series of 10-3 F  HCl solutions are prepared[2], each solution containing a different concentration of KCl in the range of 0.01 F to 0.50 F.  Plot pH (i.e., -log{H }) vs log I using:

 

 

a. Davies Equation;

 

b. Extended Debye-Huckel Equation.

2.0 points

 

Solution to 2

Ionic Strength equation

Extended Debye-Hückel equation:

 

Davies Equation

 

 

 

Davies

 

 

Extended D-H

 

[KCl]

I

log f

f

{H}

log f

f

{H}

0.01

0.011

-0.04636

0.898747

3.046363

-0.03989

0.912243

3.03989

0.02

0.021

-0.06119

0.868589

3.061186

-0.0505

0.890222

3.050502

0.03

0.031

-0.07175

0.847706

3.071755

-0.05761

0.875777

3.057606

0.04

0.041

-0.08009

0.831583

3.080094

-0.06298

0.865002

3.062983

0.05

0.051

-0.08701

0.818439

3.087014

-0.06731

0.856422

3.067312

0.06

0.061

-0.09293

0.807362

3.092932

-0.07093

0.849311

3.070933

0.07

0.071

-0.0981

0.797814

3.098098

-0.07404

0.843253

3.074042

0.08

0.081

-0.10268

0.78945

3.102675

-0.07676

0.837988

3.076762

0.09

0.091

-0.10678

0.782032

3.106776

-0.07918

0.833342

3.079177

0.1

0.101

-0.11048

0.775388

3.110481

-0.08135

0.82919

3.081346

0.11

0.111

-0.11385

0.769391

3.113853

-0.08331

0.825444

3.083312

0.12

0.121

-0.11694

0.763943

3.116939

-0.08511

0.822036

3.085109

0.13

0.131

-0.11978

0.758968

3.119776

-0.08676

0.818914

3.086762

0.14

0.141

-0.1224

0.754404

3.122396

-0.08829

0.816036

3.088291

0.15

0.151

-0.12482

0.750202

3.124822

-0.08971

0.813371

3.089711

0.16

0.161

-0.12708

0.746319

3.127075

-0.09104

0.81089

3.091038

0.17

0.171

-0.12917

0.742722

3.129173

-0.09228

0.808573

3.092281

0.18

0.181

-0.13113

0.739382

3.131131

-0.09345

0.806401

3.093449

0.19

0.191

-0.13296

0.736272

3.132961

-0.09455

0.804357

3.094551

0.2

0.201

-0.13467

0.733373

3.134675

-0.09559

0.802429

3.095593

0.21

0.211

-0.13628

0.730666

3.136281

-0.09658

0.800606

3.096581

0.22

0.221

-0.13779

0.728134

3.137789

-0.09752

0.798878

3.09752

0.23

0.231

-0.1392

0.725764

3.139205

-0.09841

0.797236

3.098413

0.24

0.241

-0.14054

0.723542

3.140536

-0.09927

0.795673

3.099265

0.25

0.251

-0.14179

0.721459

3.141789

-0.10008

0.794182

3.10008

0.26

0.261

-0.14297

0.719503

3.142967

-0.10086

0.792758

3.100859

0.27

0.271

-0.14408

0.717666

3.144077

-0.10161

0.791395

3.101606

0.28

0.281

-0.14512

0.715941

3.145123

-0.10232

0.79009

3.102324

0.29

0.291

-0.14611

0.71432

3.146107

-0.10301

0.788837

3.103013

0.3

0.301

-0.14703

0.712796

3.147035

-0.10368

0.787633

3.103676

0.31

0.311

-0.14791

0.711363

3.147909

-0.10432

0.786475

3.104315

0.32

0.321

-0.14873

0.710017

3.148731

-0.10493

0.785359

3.104932

0.33

0.331

-0.14951

0.708753

3.149505

-0.10553

0.784284

3.105527

0.34

0.341

-0.15023

0.707565

3.150234

-0.1061

0.783247

3.106101

0.35

0.351

-0.15092

0.706449

3.150919

-0.10666

0.782244

3.106658

0.36

0.361

-0.15156

0.705403

3.151563

-0.1072

0.781275

3.107196

0.37

0.371

-0.15217

0.704422

3.152167

-0.10772

0.780338

3.107717

0.38

0.381

-0.15273

0.703504

3.152734

-0.10822

0.77943

3.108223

0.39

0.391

-0.15326

0.702644

3.153264

-0.10871

0.778549

3.108714

0.4

0.401

-0.15376

0.701841

3.153761

-0.10919

0.777696

3.10919

0.41

0.411

-0.15422

0.701092

3.154225

-0.10965

0.776867

3.109653

0.42

0.421

-0.15466

0.700394

3.154657

-0.1101

0.776063

3.110103

0.43

0.431

-0.15506

0.699746

3.15506

-0.11054

0.775281

3.110541

0.44

0.441

-0.15543

0.699144

3.155433

-0.11097

0.774521

3.110967

0.45

0.451

-0.15578

0.698588

3.155779

-0.11138

0.773781

3.111382

0.46

0.461

-0.1561

0.698074

3.156098

-0.11179

0.773061

3.111786

0.47

0.471

-0.15639

0.697603

3.156392

-0.11218

0.772359

3.112181

0.48

0.481

-0.15666

0.697171

3.156661

-0.11257

0.771676

3.112565

0.49

0.491

-0.15691

0.696778

3.156906

-0.11294

0.771009

3.11294

0.5

0.501

-0.15713

0.696421

3.157128

-0.11331

0.770359

3.113307

 

 

 



[1] Not measured; estimated from historical data

[2] F refers to Formality, which is the concentration in moles per liter that would exist if the material added to the solvent did not dissociate or react in any way to change its chemical structure